Neither has anyone else!
But there are many in the Evangelical Christian community who are quite ready to state how wrong Bell is (or is going to be) in his yet-to-be-released book entitled, Love Wins. While I typically don’t write lengthy posts in regards to theological debate, I find this conversation fascinating. I am intrigued by its substance, as well as the manner in which we argue and debate in an online environment.
Tomorrow is our student government election day. Before everyone hits the polls, we’ll be hearing speeches from the candidates. These are always interesting. While none of the candidates are professional communicators, you can tell who does it better than others.
If I could sit down with each of the candidates as they put their speech together, I’d offer the following advice and suggestions:
- A speech is an experience.
You need to think about how you want people to feel after they hear your speech. You want to elicit certain emotions and ask for a commitment (ie, I want you to vote for me!). It’s so much more than the words you say. It’s how you say them that will connect.
I suppose a dad can never be too proud of his kids. Travis is my oldest and his passion is racing cars. One of our local news affiliates put this interview together to go along with the national coverage of the Daytona 500. It aired on Sunday night, February 20.
“The opposite of effective delegation is micromanagement.” - Wikipedia entry on delegation
The word, “delegation” is derived from Latin and means “to send from.” Think about it, you are taking the time to send the work “from” you “to” someone else. Effective delegation will not only give you more time to work on your important opportunities, but it also provides a variety of benefits to both delegator and delegatee.
One of the best ways to get others involved in your organization is through the process of delegation. But delegation can be a tricky issue for any leader.
Did you know there is a right and a wrong way to use social networking tools like Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin?
The reason I know this is because the internet is bombarded on a daily basis by posts, articles, and ebooks on the best uses of these tools. Shoot, I’ve even written a few “best practices” posts. Seems everyone has an opinion or touts some type of social media maven badge to show expert status.
When it comes to time management, the easiest question is to ask: What time is it? You can go up to most any stranger on the street and ask that question and he or she will have some idea at a good answer.
The harder question is this: What will I do with my time? In response to that people show their knowledge in three different types of responses:
I love social networking. I like the connections. I like the conversations. I even like the little “numbers” games that people play with followers and following (although it’s a little awkward to tell someone “I’m following you”).
There are so many social networking options out there. New opportunities to connect with people, with locations, and with great deals show up every day.
My tendency is to try and get in on something early. I know that I’m probably registered on more sites than I can remember. Not necessarily a good thing.
In one ear and out the other.
It’s a common cliche’ of a critique where a conversation (or perhaps a monologue) ends with one person feeling like the other didn’t listen.
They heard you. They nodded their head in affirmation. They even recited back to you word for word what you just said. But listening did not take place.
What was missing was the one element that moves hearing into the realm of listening. It’s called teachability.